<Jer### [at] enstfr> wrote:

> > > We seem to be the only two who think it i a good idea.
> > Better make that three.
> 	Well, four

Well, I guess I was wrong!
BTW, I think I just figured out how to implement it, just have to 
compile and test it...and another thing I noticed, MegaPOV has 
"shortcuts" for declaring, and one of them is the '%' character.(I knew 
about the shortcuts before, I just never payed attention to the specific 
characters)
I thought the '%' character was already used for a modulus operator...it 
seems like this could cause problems. Or maybe I am thinking of it's use 
in the isosurface patch...

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><

Post a reply to this message